Sheila Piercey Summers vs Beryl Bartlett Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Piercey Summers vs B. Bartlett

Sheila Piercey Summers

RSA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

106

Age

101

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Beryl Bartlett

RSA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

106

Age

101

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Summers 3 - 0 Bartlett

They have played 4 sets in total, with Sheila Piercey Summers winning 4 and Beryl Bartlett winning 0. The last match between Sheila Piercey Summers and Beryl Bartlett was at the Johannesburg, 07-04-1949, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory UNK.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Summers	3
Bartlett	0

Last H2H Matches:

() Johannesburg(04-07-49)

Stats

Sheila Piercey Summers

Beryl Bartlett

(F) Johannesburg Transvaal Chps(09-02-46)

Stats

Sheila Piercey Summers

Beryl Bartlett

(R4) Johannesburg(04-11-46)

Stats

Sheila Piercey Summers

Beryl Bartlett

S. P. Summers vs B. Bartlett H2H Profile

S. P. Summers	Stats	B. Bartlett
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
74.29% (130-45)	Career Total W/L	57.52% (65-48)
3	Clay	0
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. P. Summers vs B. Bartlett Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Beryl Bartlett has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sheila Piercey Summers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Beryl Bartlett has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sheila Piercey Summers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beryl Bartlett has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Beryl Bartlett winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sheila Piercey Summers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 79% (W/L 69/ 18), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 64% (W/L 16/ 9). Beryl Bartlett has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 26/ 27).
Player level: In the last year, Sheila Piercey Summers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Beryl Bartlett has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sheila Piercey Summers winning 2 times and Beryl Bartlett being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sheila Piercey Summers winning 4 and Beryl Bartlett winning 0. The last match between Sheila Piercey Summers and Beryl Bartlett was at the Johannesburg, 07-04-1949, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory UNK.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sheila Piercey Summers has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Beryl Bartlett has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beryl Bartlett has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sheila Piercey Summers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beryl Bartlett has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sheila Piercey Summers vs Beryl Bartlett Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. P. Summers vs B. Bartlett H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. P. Summers	Stats	B. Bartlett
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

S. P. Summers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg - 19-03-1951
F Hazel Redick SmithH. Redick	W	8-6 2-6 7-5	Stats
Port Elizabeth RSA vs USA - 19-04-1950
Robin Shirley FryS. Fry	L	5-7 6-1 6-1	Stats
Durban RSA vs USA - 15-04-1950
Robin Doris HartD. Hart	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Johannesburg - 30-03-1950
Julia WipplingerJ. Wipplinger	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
SF Shirley FryS. Fry	L	3-6 6-1 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Bartlett Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
East London - 29-12-1958
Estelle Van TonderE. Van	W	6-1 3-6 6-4	Stats
SF Bernice CarrB. Carr	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Surbiton - 26-05-1958
R2 Mrs A HughesM. A	W	6-3 6-0	Stats
R3 Anthea GibbA. Gibb	L	3-6 6-2 7-5	Stats
Hurlingham - 28-04-1958
R2 Gillian FindlayG. Findlay	W	6-4 6-1	Stats

View All

S. P. Summers vs B. Bartlett Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. P. Summers	Stats	B. Bartlett
74.29% (130/45)	YTD Win/Loss	57.52% (65/48)
71.85% (268/105)	Sets Win/Loss	56.91% (140/106)
60.25% (1989/1312)	Games Win/Loss	53.46% (1197/1042)
75.00% (6/2)	Hard Win/Loss	55.56% (5/4)
79.31% (69/18)	Clay Win/Loss	49.06% (26/27)
70.91% (39/16)	Grass Win/Loss	67.74% (21/10)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
72.00% (18/7)	Slam W/L	40.00% (2/3)
74% (125/169)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (64/108)
52% (17/33)	Deciding Set Win %	62% (18/29)
91% (129/117)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (62/54)
9% (129/12)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (62/8)
24% (42/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (47/10)